myPartnerPerfect.com - First Gay Compatibility Profiling System

PR NEWSWIRE -- June 1 -- myPartnerPerfect.com launches today as the first and only dating service with a compatibility system specifically designed for gay men. Patrick H. Perrine created the Partner Perfect Compatibility(TM) test and enhanced profile search engine specifically for the unique characteristics of gay partner selection. Members complete a free Partner Perfect Compatibility(TM) profile, use guided communication tools and begin conversations with other members, whilst learning the secrets of developing a successful relationship through Patrick's Dating Advice column, e-newsletters and articles. Membership is available for $37.95 a month through $16.95 a month with a year's commitment. Private Matchmaking services are available from $2999. Services include 'myProfilePartner,' a profile makeover and photo review service. 'weDate,' where relationship experts arrange private dinners in San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Diego, and D.C. 'uQuickPick' allows a member to modify their searches by setting their own deal breakers. And 'myCall' a bi-directional anonymous phone calling system.

The full article was originally published at PR Newswire, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: Fyi, I'm providing myPartnerPerfect with PR, bus dev and strategic advisement services. Watch this space. Press can reach me at 212-444-1636 to schedule an interview with Patrick.

Comments

[James Houran]

Congrats to Dr. Patrick! This should make for a nice contrast to eHarmony given the recent media storm about issues of exclusion.

I would appreciate interviewing him for OnlineDatingMagazine.

Thanks,

James Houran, Ph.D.
Online Dating Magazine

[Duane Dahl]

We are disappointed in eHarmony’s continued practice of discriminating against the gay community and other groups, for example those who have had multiple divorces. Ultimately, however, we believe eHarmony will do whatever it wants, including discriminating against whomever it wants, but that consumers will be the ultimate judge as to whether institutional discrimination is smart business. The alleged justification eHarmony puts forth for discriminating against same-sex relationships is hogwash. Science says that the gay and lesbian community basically wants the same thing heterosexuals want. We believe eHarmony should be more candid about its real reasons for discriminating and should stop hiding behind false ‘science.’

As eHarmony’s chief competitor, Perfectmatch.com does not believe it is right or smart to discriminate against groups. We never have and never will judge our members. Our service is based on science and accommodates anyone that wishes to find a committed, long-lasting relationship - no matter their sexual preference.

Despite the progress made in mainstream media representations, Perfectmatch recognizes that the gay and lesbian community is still underserved as an audience. We strive to fill that void by welcoming all singles seeking relationships to use our service - including individuals who are pursuing same-sex relationships. We believe that all people deserve the opportunity to find the person right for them.

Duane Dahl
CEO, PerfectMatch.com

[Harry Kratel, COO Parship]

Dear Mark,

it was great to read your article. Please allow me to point out that your statement:

"the first and only dating service with a compatibility system specifically designed for gay men."

might be right when you are talking about the US. In Europe however Parship, Europes leading dating service or longterm relationship started serving this market a long time ago.

Harry
COO, Parship.com

[CJ]

"Science says that the gay and lesbian community basically wants the same thing heterosexuals want." What a crock. I'm sure some study somewhere says that, but you can't make a general statement which implies that it has been scientifically proven that gays want the same thing as heterosexuals. That is ridiculous and only a fool would believe that.

And don't give me that discrimination crap about eHarmony. They should be allowed to choose who they serve and who they don't serve. You "open-minded" liberals think you're so much better than conservatives who stand up for what they believe is right. Give me a break. If you're so open-minded, then how about letting conservatives believe what they believe without you passing judgment on them (which isn't very open-minded, by the way).