OPW -- May 4 -- Heads up! Rumors have come in from multiple sources that Userplane is folding. Its too small for AOL to consider selling, and apparently not worthwhile them continuing to run. Its a shame really. Companies like Toksta and Ekko.tv stand to benefit from the void Userplane will leave. Markus Frind says that IM was his biggest mistake. He's getting far more pageviews now he's pulled it. But paid sites are less interested in page views, so perhaps its still worthwhile paid sites using IM. There are a number of IM alternatives we're reviewing. We'll be presenting our findings at the upcoming Internet Dating Conference, and on the Courtland Brooks blog. (Full Disclosure: Plentyoffish.com is a current, long term client of Courtland Brooks. Userplane is a former client of Courtland Brooks)
I've been trying for weeks now to contact someone at Userplane.com in
order to integrate their tools with our website.
I've called.
I've left voicemails.
I've emails.
I've sent follow up emails.
I've even gone so far as to dig up current (former?) employees via
LinkedIn and Facebook in an effort to contact someone. ANYONE!
No response.
And today was the final straw. I just so happen to live in LA, and was
in Santa Monica (where their office is located) so I swung by to see if
I could find a human. The office door was locked. The buzzer rang for
several minutes and no one answered. I went to the back door. No one
went in our out of the building for at least 15 minutes.
Not a human in sight.
I'm convinced that the offices have been closed down and AOL has
swallowed them up and and sent the employees packing.
Posted by: Jason Grunstra | May 04, 2009 at 12:55 PM
I don't understand something about IM. I saw that POF also claimed IM was the worst decision he ever made.
Is it a bad decision just because it lowers pageviews? I'm the Community Manager for a paid dating site and IM is central to our Community. If the community wants it, why is it a bad idea?
Posted by: Ryan | May 04, 2009 at 06:26 PM
I guess allowing IM was a bad decision from a business point of view but not necessarily for the end user. POF is a business and if more page views are generated without IM then that means more ad impressions and clicks.
Posted by: Tom | May 04, 2009 at 07:45 PM
IM is great for users, but may not be as good for business. Depends on your website. Some sites are build _around_ IM and may not exist without one.
Posted by: Andrew Boon | May 05, 2009 at 07:35 AM
Hi everyone, my name is Felix and I am co-founder and CEO of toksta.com.
I would like to invite all Userplane customers to give toksta a try:
We offer a 15-day free trial and an extra 10% lifetime discount for all current Userplane customers if you sign up until May, 15th. toksta also features:
* Super easy implementation (copy & paste script or Plugin)
* 100% hosted by toksta
* No bandwidth or A/V chat limitations
* Completely integrates with your user DB
* Full design customization, logo branding and CSS support
* And much more!
Please contact support [ at ] toksta ( . ) com if you have any questions!
- Felix
Posted by: Felix Fidelsberger | May 05, 2009 at 08:48 AM
Nice linkbait title, did you contact Userplane before telling the world they are going out of business?
Chat has never really taken off on dating, too difficult to monitor.
What kind of testbed are you using for your review of chat clients?
Posted by: David Evans | May 05, 2009 at 12:03 PM
Michael Jones was the guy who started Userplane, but rumor has it that he was recently appointed to a COO for MySpace. Once he sold the business to AOL, things started going down. To bad they missed on a gold mine. Can I buy them from AOL for a penny?
Posted by: Online Dating | be2.net | May 06, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Michael Jones from Tsavo.com has confirmed that at this point it is only a rumor
Posted by: Online Dating | be2.net | May 06, 2009 at 01:12 PM
I personally found the IM useful when using in POF... To chat with a person, and getting a feel for the person before giving someone my msn or yahoo etc... Some user would have it disabled . I sure to many guys just hit that IM button, instead of sending a message first... could see how that would of been annoying.. I can see why this option isnt good for business... People have others means of communicating online... so isnt worth having it..
Anyhow, Markus... sees i have a problem with my POF account, which was working last time i signed up, but everytime i delete it for a peroid of time, and when i come back i sign up, than gets automatically deleted... Have i been flagged? Any insight why this happens? Anyways... hopefully this minor problem can get resolved thanks...
Posted by: MN | May 09, 2009 at 08:15 AM
Hi there!
My name is Nick Schneble, and I used to be the senior developer over at Userplane. Before anyone asks, I can't confirm or deny any shutdown rumors. :-)
I wrote all of the Flex and AIR applications for Userplane, and since leaving I've started a new company, Topicfox, with the intent of providing a robust, stable and highly scalable white-label IM solution.
As a result of my many years at Userplane, Topicfox is 100% compatible with existing Userplane WM configurations, and can be imported and converted for use by Topicfox with very little client interaction.
I'm looking to provide a far more hands-on solution than Userplane, with a greater amount of client feedback.
If you have an existing Userplane Webmessenger (IM) setup, and/or you may be interested in a solution customized exactly the way you want, drop me a line!
You can reach me at nick (at) topicfox.com
Posted by: Nick Schneble | May 09, 2009 at 08:53 PM
"Markus Frind says that IM was his biggest mistake. He's getting far more pageviews now he's pulled it"
Everyone seems to be lumping chat and IM together. Userplane provides both. We consider group chat rooms to be an essential part of our community. Instant messaging between individuals is another matter.
Posted by: oodlum | May 11, 2009 at 03:05 AM
Hi Nick
The URL http://www.topicfox.com/userplane.html gives a 404. Do you provide support for the Desktop Presence application as well? (The non-AIR version being far superior.) We also use the WebRecorder, no instant messaging.
Thanks.
Posted by: Alan Davies | May 13, 2009 at 05:06 AM
Hi Alan,
Sorry about the 404- we're moving our website and not all the DNS records have been updated yet.
Unfortunately we don't have an alternative to Desktop Presence. The system it was built on in fairly complex, and for the moment our focus is primarily on white-label IM.
Posted by: Nick Schneble | May 14, 2009 at 09:20 PM
AVChat.net also provide some very powerful flash video chat software. Right now they have video chat and video recording. They don't host the software , you get to buy it and install it on your website!
So anyone looking for an alternative to the Userplane Webchat here you go: http://www.avchat.net
Posted by: Michael, a happy customer | May 27, 2009 at 12:38 PM
Dave,
You write 'chat has never really taken off on dating..." I can see your point! The current versions of IM are not well suited for online dating … women especially get turned off when chat boxes start popping up all over the place.
On the other hand, the concept of getting to know someone through a real-time chat before meeting him face-to-face makes a lot of sense. Research shows that “virtual dating” creates superior online dating experience and leads to better offline dating too (just Google “Improving Online Dating with Virtual Dates”).
While a simple chat is not enough to create the right type of interaction … a properly designed “virtual dating” application drives user activity, facilitates the discovery process, increases “time on site” ... and attracts women.
Perhaps the question is not having a chat or not, but what kind of chat is well suited to getting to know someone online...
Posted by: Ravit | May 29, 2009 at 04:51 PM
I'm amazed anyone would take public credit for programming this application. From a user's perspective, the A/V Userplane chat has to be the worst chat client I've ever used. I'm constantly finding my cursor forced out of the box when the other person sends a line, and have to mouseclick back into it. Tremendously annoying program. As of now, the program is still in use on DateHookup, and is still a disaster, as Donald Trump would put it. There is a much different app in use on OKCupid that has none of the problems from A/V. Considering that IMs have been out there for nearly two decades, and their advanced state, I find this program a particularly disappointing piece of programming.
Posted by: Andrew Poretz | Jun 08, 2009 at 06:06 PM
This is not something worth taking credit for. Userplane went out of business because their product sucked, esp the front end. I remember when myspace had userplane chat, someone took the iniative to write an alternative app so they didnt have to use userplane.
Also sounds like you are violating a non compete agreement if you had one lol
Posted by: iamp20 | Jun 20, 2009 at 04:29 PM
I was also referred to 123flashchat.com yesterday as another alternative.
We're reviewing Ekko.tv, Meebo, OmniDate (former Courtland Brooks client) and Toksta at iDate in Los Angeles next week.
I think the folks at Userplane are trying to keep Userplane alive, but noone has disputed that Userplane Ist Kaput with anything solid, as yet.
Posted by: Mark Brooks | Jun 21, 2009 at 12:46 AM
Here is a question for you Nick. You say that you used to work for userplane. My understanding is that some people that worked for them joined a group called "Ebaums" and proceeded to hack into chat rooms at userplane. I am sure you were not involved with that if it is in fact true at all. I guess if userplane had enough complaints and their systems were being jeopardized, it can get pretty overwhelming for them. I just don't understand why they did not tell their clients about the possibility of shutting down. Is Topicfox going to provide a demo on their site?
Posted by: mellie | Jun 21, 2009 at 06:55 PM
Here's the new pricing on Userplane...
Price Per Month Simul. Connections Est. Daily Visitors Max Transfer
FREE (Ad-Supported) 9 0-100 9GB
$130 10 0 - 5,000 15GB
$275 25 5,000 - 12,500 25GB
$475 50 12,500 - 25,000 50GB
$850 100 25,000 - 50,000 100GB
$1,625 250 50,000 - 100,000 250GB
$2,750 500 100,000 - 250,000 500GB
Here's a link to all the top news on Userplane in summary format on Online Personals Watch
http://www.onlinepersonalswatch.com/news/userplanewatchcom/
In May I reported that AOL was going to pull the plug on Userplane. I had two trusted sources confirm this. Then Userplane attended iDate L.A. and officially refuted this. Then they offer up pricing of 100 concurrent users at $10k a year.
Userplane ist kaput.
Posted by: Mark Brooks | Oct 19, 2009 at 10:11 AM
Seems like the real potential is on the board.
Posted by: Emr | Mar 12, 2011 at 06:13 PM